Trump Administration Telegraphs Sweeping Trade Policy Changes Affecting Shippers NVOs

Trump Administration Telegraphs Sweeping Trade Policy Changes Affecting Shippers NVOs

By John H. Kester

The President signed 26 Executive Orders (“E.O.s”) on Monday relating, inter alia, to immigration, gang violence, and foreign aid. In addition, however, the Administration issued an America First Trade Policy memorandum, referencing numerous potential trade policy changes. Those potential changes would dramatically affect shippers and NVOs.

The stated goal is to “promote[] investment and productivity, enhance[] our National’s industrial and technological advantages, defend[] our economic and national security, and – above all – benefits American workers, manufacturers, farmers, ranchers, entrepreneurs, and businesses.” Pointing to, among other things, the U.S. trade deficit in goods, the memorandum posits a “global supplemental tariff or other policies,” and specifically forecasts the following actions and potential changes:

  • Implementing an “External Revenue Service” to collect tariffs, duties, and other foreign trade-related revenue;
  • Taking “appropriate actions” to remedy foreign countries “unfair trade practices” under various potential authorities;
  • Reviewing the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (“USMCA”) to assess its impact on American workers, farmers, ranchers, services providers, and other businesses and “make recommendations regarding…[U.S.] participation in the Agreement”;
  • Reviewing existing trade agreements and determining “any revisions that may be necessary or appropriate” with an eye to reciprocity among the U.S. and its partners;
  • Exploring agreements with foreign countries to promote U.S. export market access;
  • Reviewing anti-dumping and countervailing duty policies and regulations, including whether existing procedures “sufficiently induce compliance by foreign respondents and governments”;
  • Assessing risks and loss of tariff revenue from counterfeit goods and drugs, which result, according to the memorandum, from allowing imports valued at $800 or less to enter the country without duty;
  • Investigating extraterritorial taxes implemented by foreign countries against U.S. citizens or corporations;
  • “Review[ing] the impact of all trade agreements” including the World Trade Organization Agreement on Government Procurement.

Actions directed at China specifically include:

  • Reviewing the U.S.’s Economic and Trade Agreement with China, “to determine whether the PRC is acting in accordance” therewith, and “recommend appropriate actions to be taken…up to and including the imposition of tariffs and other measures as needed”;
  • Investigating “acts, policies, and practices by the PRC [People’s Republic of China] that may be unreasonable or discriminatory and that may burden or restrict United States commerce.”

Actions directed specifically at national security include:

  • Reviewing and assessing the effectiveness of exclusions, exemptions, and other import adjustment measures on steel and aluminum;
  • Assessing “how to maintain, obtain, and enhance our National’s technological edge” including by “eliminat[ing] existing export controls – especially those that enable the transfer of strategic goods, software, services, and technology to countries to strategic rivals and their proxies”;
  • Considering whether an existing rulemaking regarding controls on connected vehicles “should be expanded to account for additional connected products”;
  • Reviewing whether “sufficient controls to address national security threats” are included in Provisions Pertaining to U.S. Investments in Certain National Security Technologies and Products in Countries of Concern, a rule requiring U.S. persons to notify the Department of Treasury regarding certain transactions involving sensitive technologies and countries of concern.

Based upon the above, sweeping changes could come fast, and GKG will actively monitor changes relevant to its clients, following up with additional client alerts. For now, shippers and NVOs would be prudent to:

  1. Review the memorandum for potential changes affecting their businesses;
  2. To the extent possible, prepare and implement systems designed to mitigate any damage the foregoing potential changes could cause to their businesses;
  3. Actively monitor for new developments in this fast-developing environment.

We hope this is helpful, and please let us know if you have any questions.

 

Webinar Maximizing Deductibility of Aircraft Operating Expenses and Depreciation Postponed.

Due to unforeseen circumstances, the webinar scheduled for today, January 15, 2025, will be held January 29, 2025, 2-3pm EST. Please see the below announcement if you have not already registered.

GKG’s Business Aviation and Tax Group presents, “Maximizing Deductibility of Aircraft Operating Expenses and Depreciation.” (January 29, 2025, 2-3pm ET). An overview of the most significant tax provisions that limit the deductibility of aircraft operating expenses and depreciation, and best practices for recordkeeping and compliance. Click here to register for the live webinar: Microsoft Virtual Events Powered by Teams.

FTC Appeals Nationwide Stay of Rule Banning Non-Compete Clauses

FTC Appeals Nationwide Stay of Rule
Banning Non-Compete Clauses

Richard Bar, Rachel Amster

In October of 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) appealed a federal Texas District Court’s (Texas Court) order setting aside the FTC’s Non-Compete Clause Rule (Rule) which banned almost all new noncompete clauses. The Texas Court’s set aside applied nationwide and prevents the Rule from taking effect. On January 2, 2025, the FTC filed its appellate brief. It argued that: (1) contrary to the Texas Court’s determination, the FTC has authority to issue the Rule; (2) the Rule was based on the FTC’s thorough and reasonable determination that non-compete clauses are unfair methods of competition, which the Texas Court disregarded; and (3) the nationwide set aside was unwarranted and unnecessary.

The FTC also filed its brief in an appeal of a federal Florida District Court’s (Florida Court) order which preliminarily enjoined the Rule on different grounds. The Florida Court’s order was more limited than the Texas Court’s order. The Florida Court’s order only applied to the plaintiff in that case. Of note, the Florida Court’s order rejected some of the bases of the Texas Court’s set aside. The Florida Court agreed with the FTC that the FTC has authority to issue rules regarding unfair methods of competition, such as the Rule.

The opposing briefs to the Texas Court and Florida Court’s orders are due this month and February, respectively.

GKG continues to monitor these matters. Further updates will follow. Feel free to contact Rich Bar (rbar@gkglaw.com) or Rachel Amster (ramster@gkglaw.com) if you have any questions.

Webinar – Maximizing Deductibility of Aircraft Operating Expenses and Depreciation

GKG Law’s Business Aviation &
Tax Webinar Presentation

January 15, 2025 (2pm – 3pm ET): “Maximizing Deductibility of Aircraft Operating Expenses and Depreciation.” GKG’s Business Aviation and Tax Group will provide an overview of the most significant tax provisions that limit the deductibility of aircraft operating expenses and depreciation, and best practices for recordkeeping and compliance. Click here to register for the live webinar Microsoft Virtual Events Powered by Teams

Upcoming 2025 Webinars  

  1. Aircraft Personal Use: Disallowance of Tax Deductions and Planning Opportunities
  2. Preparing for IRS Aircraft Audits.
  3. Aircraft Dry Lease Structures and FAA Compliance.
  4. IRS, SEC and FAA Compliance for Aircraft Operated by Publicly Traded Companies.
  5. State Tax Considerations for Aircraft Owners and Operators.

CTA Update – December 27, 2024

Late last night, December 26, 2024, a Fifth Circuit Panel has reinstated the nationwide injunction blocking the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”). In the order, the Court stated that “in order to preserve the constitutional status quo while the merits panel considers the parties’ weighty substantive arguments, that part of the motions-panel ordering granting the Government’s motion to stay the district court’s preliminary injunction enjoining enforcement of the CTA and the reporting rule is vacated.”

Why This Matters: Earlier this week, the FinCEN announced an extension of the filing requirements to January 13, 2025. However, once again, the enforcement of the CTA is no longer required.

This situation is rapidly evolving. We anticipate this case may end up in the United States Supreme Court’s hands. We will continue to review and monitor the situation and keep you apprised of the latest developments. Please feel free to reach out to Rich Bar (rbar@gkglaw.com) or Frank Beninato (fbeninato@gkglaw.com) if you have any questions.

CTA – Update December 24, 2024

Yesterday afternoon, December 23, 2024, we learned that the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit revived the immediate enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). The Fifth Circuit’s decision stayed the preliminary injunction issued on December 3, 2024, and allows the federal government to continue enforcing the CTA while litigation in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al. continues.

Following the ruling, FinCEN announced an extension of the filing deadline to January 13, 2025 (from January 1, 2025). Reporting Companies that are created or registered on or after January 1, 2025, have thirty (30) days to file their BOI reports with FinCEN after receiving actual or public notice that their creation or registration is effective.

Why This Matters: Compliance with the CTA is again required. Existing Reporting Companies are now required to file their BOI reports by January 13, 2025. Reporting Companies that are created after January 1, 2025, have thirty (30) days after creation to comply with the BOI. Even though an extension was granted, the deadline is quickly approaching. It is imperative to confirm your filing requirements (if any) and do so timely to avoid any fines and penalties.

This situation is rapidly evolving. We anticipate the challengers in this suit to seek further review from the Fifth Circuit or the United States Supreme Court. We will continue to review and monitor the situation and keep you apprised of the latest developments. Please feel free to reach out to Rich Bar (rbar@gkglaw.com) or Frank Beninato (fbeninato@gkglaw.com) if you have any questions.

CTA – Update

Following last week’s enjoinment of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has announced that reporting companies are not currently required to file beneficial ownership information with FinCEN and are not subject to liability if they fail to do so while the order remains in force. Reporting companies may, however, continue to voluntarily submit beneficial ownership information reports should they so desire.

Why This Matters: While the litigation is ongoing, FinCEN has stated it will comply with the federal court order for as long as it remains in effect, and compliance with the January 1, 2025 deadline proscribed in the CTA is not required.

As always, we will continue to review and monitor the situation and keep you apprised of the latest developments. Please feel free to reach out to us in the meantime if you have any questions.

CTA – Eastern District of Texas Injunction

Late Tuesday afternoon (December 3, 2024), we learned that the U.S. District Court in Texas has enjoined the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”) in part due to the question of whether the CTA is constitutional and beyond the powers instilled to Congress. For reference, this was decided in a case titled Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Merick Garland, Civil Action No. 4:24-CV-478, E.D., Texas.

Why This Matters: Under the ruling, Reporting Companies with a reporting deadline of January 1, 2025 no longer have to file a Beneficial Owner Information report. It is likely that the government will challenge this ruling. However, at this time, compliance with the January 1, 2025 deadline proscribed in the CTA is not required.

We will continue to review and monitor this situation. Please feel free to reach out to Rich Bar (rbar@gkglaw.com) or Frank Beninato, III (fbeninato@gkglaw.com) in the meantime if you have any questions.

Rich Bar and Frank Beninato, III
GKG Law

Copyright © 2026. All Rights Reserved.